Posts Tagged 60s
The Beatles | S/T
Alright, I’ve got two copies of this one, both the stereo mix on CD. There’s notable differences between the two, which I’m going to focus on because trying to come up with some kind of original thought on this album is insane and pointless.
But isn’t this whole thing insane and pointless? One day someone might sit me down and say, “Look, you’ve proved your point or whatever with this record review thing. Why not [do this other thing], we’ll pay you. Real job, it’ll keep you busy. I understand this blog thing is the closest thing you’ve had to a desk job and that you only keep doing it to keep from going completely insane, but that’s enough for us. Just forget it.” I might go for that. Not counting on it, but I sure haven’t turned down such an offer. But how could I make sure, even once ensconced within the cushy chair of seated gainful employment, I don’t fully lose it for good? Most people have some thing, I’m sure you’ve said it: “If I didn’t have _____ I’d go crazy!” Would you? You’d go crazy. You’d take off all your clothes, jump out of a window screaming, run down a crowded street on broken ankles and among horrified onlookers, cut your throat with a butter knife. I’ve never done any thing quite like that. But I keep blogging just to be sure.
Maybe it’s in bad taste to bring up such things in a review of this particular album, as it somehow inspired Charles Manson to…go crazy. I’m not making any effort to unravel any of the lyrics or themes on this thing except to say as an artist, you can never second guess what your supposed message could be or what it could inspire in a crazy person, because they can literally make anything mean anything. I mean Helter Skelter is about an amusement park ride. Paul’s just really enthusiastic about it. But there I go with stuff you can read elsewhere.
I bought the first version in ’94, I remember that’s when I got a CD player and the Beatles albums were some of the first ones I got. Came in a longbox, two single CD cases. I got tired of them getting separated because when I listen to this thing it’s gotta be all the way through every time. So when they started making the dual cases I put them together. I still prefer this to the fancy slipcase foldout deal of the new reissue, and the minimalist Parlophone labels are far…uh, don’t wanna say “superior”…they tie the whole design together. The new one also has some new photos and notes, who cares. I like the zero meta commentary of the first reissue. You can make whatever you want of it. Hopefully it’s not a paranoid, murderous fantasy that you tragically manifest, but what are the odds of that, more than once. Not something you should worry about. Sorry, I keep bringing it up.
Really, it’s not something I used to think about when I listened to the thing. I’m not listening to it right now. Usually when I do these things, I put the record on repeat the whole time until I’m done with it. I prefer not do that now because there’s just so many paths to go down that could go on forever and I used to have this thing where I listened to it every year on my birthday, which is so corny it’s embarrassing to admit and I also used to get very drunk for this which I try not to do at all anymore so why bum myself out with a half-assed experience.
I try to put the whole thing entirely in it’s own context. No, you can’t cut it down to one disc, or listen to it doing the dishes or anything else. You gotta lay down and put the headphones on and every stupid thing is intentional and important. It’s a conceptual album with no concept. It’s a kind of story, like a David Lynch movie. Some things are better left unexplained. It’s just pure experience.
But I’m going to point out one major beef with the remaster, and it’s got nothing to do with compression or any kind of audiophile thing which is maybe there if you really get into that but it’s just one song I notice a big difference: While My Guitar Gently Weeps. Because that is one of those songs that is just such a classic rock pop song, you know this song even if you never sat down and really listened, and everyone makes a big deal about the Clapton solo but I do not give a fuck about that—it’s that the way it’s originally recorded is so crazily cacophonous with that high-pitch organ drone, it’s almost painful. That really blew me away more than anything, that they got away with that sounding like it did. Of course on the remaster, they went back to the original tapes and turned the organ down. Wow. That pretty much says it all.
So, if you don’t have this, I really think you need the non-remastered version. On Amazon the only option for that right now is the 1990 reissue on cassette. That’s probably not worth it. Look around. I’ll eventually try to get an old vinyl copy if I can find one in good shape at a reasonable price. It depends if I live long enough to eventually get paid. Might be worth it.
%
Velvet Underground | VU
RIP, Lou Reed.
“It just feels so insincere and like a cop-out. To me, ‘RIP’ is the microwave dinner of posthumous honours” ~ Lou Reed
Well…fuck you then, Lou Reed. I mean…jeez.
I originally was going to end the post like that. I got complicated feelings about Lou Reed but it’s a little much to make it into a punchline. And it’s not really fair to make a Velvet Underground review only about him. But this is the format I have chosen to talk about my bullshit. The man’s dead and this is the only physical release I own with his music on it. (If John Cale just died I would be forced to reach for the same record. Yes, this would be a serious gaping hole if I was a serious collector of serious music.)
There’s a practical reason this is my only Velvets record, it was cheapest. (Altho it is currently somewhat pricey on Amazon.) Might have even got it for free. Had a few neighbors at one point in the 90s who just dumped boxes of vinyl on the curb as they replaced their collection with CDs. It was not a more enlightened time. The sleeve is in decent enough shape, but I like the record itself. I like that they were on Verve. It’s like, wow, legit!
Songs off the first album with Nico, and Transformer are really my favorites. But those songs are just always kinda around. Never felt the need to own those records. And you usually never see them for less than full-price.
Altho I like the record a lot, I rarely flip it over. B-side does not win this time, those songs really do sound like leftovers. This is a basically comp of outtakes; every song on the 1st side however, seem like classics it’s hard to believe they didn’t use. (Reed re-recorded all of them solo. I prefer these versions by a long mile.) I used to have the CD reissue of Loaded (sold it); the second disc has different versions of I’m Sticking With You and Ocean. I’m Sticking With You is a cute song that Mo sings but it’s kind of a goof. Ocean—it’s just perfect on this record. The cliche in my head I’m trying to avoid is “understated masterpiece”. I think ‘masterpiece’ is overselling it, but other versions are a little too overthought or overworked. I believe all my feelings about Lou Reed can summed up by listening to the VU and solo versions of Ocean back to back. At least until recently. Going thorough some of of his stuff I never listened to and posts about details of his life I kinda feel bad for him now.
I Can’t Stand It is one of the great Rock ‘n’ Roll songs of all time. It makes the song Rock ‘n’ Roll (from Loaded) corny by comparison. I dunno, some of his schtick I don’t really buy. Especially the later stuff. He just went off in a direction I don’t care about at all. The atmosphere of some of these Velvets songs is so great, you really have to credit the rest of the group. The way way Ocean ends, this version…that’s just one the best things ever recorded. It just hits a perfect unnameable emotion every time. The words don’t tell a story or nothing. No idea what it really means. Perfect.
I also really do love Metal Machine Music too, but I got it off Soulseek. %
V/A | Beat Xmas
Like many internet mixtapes I review, since I listened to it the original link has gone down. But this one has been reposted to WFMU’s Rock ‘n’ Soul Ichiban blog. Seems I can’t be bothered to get around to things in a reasonably timely manner. It’s a personal problem I’m working on. How are you doing?
That’s great, I mean, too bad. Sorry about that. I’m a little distracted. Look, I know this might not be a great time, but I need to talk about this thing I listened to. It’s not important. Well, it’s important to me. Alright, maybe this specific internet mixtape is not that “important” to me even…I enjoyed it. Can’t I…share my enjoyment? It’s better than posting pictures of everything I stuff in my stupid face. Oh stop. No one told you to post those pictures. They did? For real? Well, those people are no friends. Forget about them.
What’s Beat? Is this mix “Beat”? I think it’s “Beat”…but but not Beat. Dig? It’s a fun time, but don’t get any big ideas. There’s maybe a dozen people who were The Beats, then there’s the Jazz guys, then there’s the beatniks (the fans), then there’s not-beatniks, then there’s the not-really-having-anything-to-do-with-anything-just-happened-to-be-theres. And the in-betweeners.
I was not there. I’m 34. But I used to really be obsessed with ‘The Beat Generation’. Still am somewhat, but now I think it’s a mistake to think of it like that. It’s like calling the 90s ‘The Grunge Generation’. It’s just not accurate. This mix is just some holiday-themed fun, but why not completely tear it apart into non-fun atoms? Because there’s better stuff to do, relax. I’m not going that far with it. But we can separate who’s who here.
- Jack Kerouc – ultimate Beat, obvs.
- Lloyd Glenn – legit jazz guy
- Tony Rodelle Larson – Gettin’ suspect. No info on this guy, seems to be a one-off novelty record, but there’s not really jokes in it. Maybe a failed attempt at a crossover career. We get both sides of his only single.
- Lowell Fulson – More of a Blues guy than a Jazz guy
- Jim Backus & Daws Butler – Mr. Magoo vs. Fake Beat, sort of. Funny, sort of.
- Pony Poindexder – Jazz, man. Altho, this is on the far edge of the Beat Era, well into the 60s.
- Jimmy Bowman – Beat version of Night Before Christmas. Another one-off, could have been a minor jazz guy.
- The Mello Moods – Borderline. The Christmas Song is pretty square, but they do their best to jazz it up. It’s not really a Jazz group, it’s transitional into into R&B/Rock.
- Miles Davis & Bob Dorough – I imagine Miles Davis smacking the shit out of anyone calling him a beatnik. Hard to imagine him sharing breathing space with this vocalist, but it happened.
- Hank Crawford – Jazz dude, transitioning into Soul.
- Oscar McLollie – Pretty much early Rock with some Beat lingo.
- Johnny Guarnieri with Slam Stewart – Real jazzbos, joke song. Fun times.
- The Charlie Parker Quintet – Bird, man.
- Babs Gonzales – This guy was a full-time jazz vocalist, no joke. But his style sometimes crosses into of self-parody. Easy to confuse where the line is. Also he apparently considered legit as a poet.
- Marlowe Morris – Jazz-soul…this has to be way into the 60s. Kerouac never heard this stuff.
- Patsy Raye & the Beatniks – This is one knocked out crazy chick. The musicians sound more like part of the lounge scene, a one-off group trying to cash in towards the end of the era. Kinda cool tho.
- The Ronnie Kole Trio – Standard jazz group.
- William S. Burroughs – Burroughs, man. Possibly at his least nihilistic.
- Manfred Mann – Huh?
- The Phil Moore Four – legit jazz dude, kinda pushin’ it.
- Lord Buckley – legit non-jazz non-beatnik, his take on Scrooge is more enjoyable before you realize it’s straight-up minstrelsy. So hopefully you’ve listened to the whole thing before reading this. Pretty great.
- Edd “Kookie” Byrnes – Man, was he beat. NOPE. It’s cool tho, man. Is it? Cool it man, it’s the past.
I went over this a few times (totally Un-Beat), like, “yeah, this guy’s a beatnik, that guy is, real beatnik here, fake beatnik there”, whatever. But NONE of these cats (can I say “cats”?) are beatninks. It’s just another word for hipster. Despite how anyone else uses those words I think there’s a clear and non-necessarily derogatory definition: it’s the type of person that lives the lifestyle of an artist without actually creating anything. Anybody that is creating art, whatever you call them…they made something. (And I don’t think fashion counts as a thing, unless you’re making the clothes from scratch.) Oh, but I’ve gone off on a thing. I’ll let you get back to whatever. Hippy Holidays and such.
Feels good! %
Recent Comments